Countries legally obliged to consider slavery | Quik

Protesters in London calling for reparations. At least 12.5 ‌million Africans were taken and sold between the 15th and 19th centuries. Photograph: Wiktor Szymanowicz/Future Publishing/Getty ImagesView image in fullscreenProtesters in London calling for reparations. At least 12.5 ‌million Africans were taken and sold between the 15th and 19th centuries. Photograph: Wiktor Szymanowicz/Future Publishing/Getty ImagesReparations and reparative justiceCountries legally obliged to consider slavery reparations, says UN committeeGuidance says states must implement ‘comprehensive measures’ to address legacy of racial discrimination

Prefer the Guardian on GoogleA UN committee has said countries are legally obliged to consider reparations for the transatlantic slave trade and take other ⁠measures to address the enduring ⁠legacy of racial discrimination.

Guidance published on Monday by the committee on the elimination of racial discrimination (CERD) said the obligations arose from ⁠a legally binding 1965 convention on racial discrimination, not from the legal standards that existed when the slave trade took place.

The committee described the approach as a “paradigm ⁠shift” away from debates over historical responsibility that have often been used by governments to resist reparations claims.

“States parties must implement comprehensive reparatory measures for ‌people of African descent, ‌covering all aspects of remedies,” said the UN document, which may be cited in courtrooms.

At least 12.5 ‌million Africans were taken and sold between the 15th and 19th centuries in what CERD called the largest forced displacement in history.

Calls for reparations – ranging from official apologies to financial compensation – have gained momentum internationally, though opponents argue states and institutions should not be held responsible for historical crimes. The EU and Britain abstained from a UN resolution ‌on slavery in March.

Some states have sought to dodge claims for justice in courtrooms by arguing that there were no international laws outlawing the slave trade at the time – the so-called intertemporality principle.

But the UN document argues that, regardless of whether slavery and the slave trade were illegal under the laws of the day, countries remain responsible under current international obligations to tackle their continuing effects.

“Irrespective of the legal characterisation of the original historical acts, states parties remain bound ⁠by their present obligations under the convention to address structural inequalities,” the UN document says.

Financial compensation alone is not sufficient, it adds, urging “transformative” measures including opening archives, revising public memorials and establishing independent truth commissions.

Free newsletter | WeeklySign up to The Long Wave

Nesrine Malik, Micha Frazer-Carroll and the team guide you through the biggest Black stories from around the world

Pela Boker Wilson, a committee expert from Liberia who helped draft ‌the document, said she expected states to move beyond broad expressions of regret and review policies and laws.