A quarter of young Africans believe USAID cuts could be positive, survey finds

Sports fans in Accra, Ghana waving the national flag. More than 40% of Ghanaians aged 18-24 were optimistic about their country’s future after USAID cuts. Photograph: Ulrich Doering/AlamyView image in fullscreenSports fans in Accra, Ghana waving the national flag. More than 40% of Ghanaians aged 18-24 were optimistic about their country’s future after USAID cuts. Photograph: Ulrich Doering/AlamyGlobal developmentA quarter of young Africans believe USAID cuts could be positive, survey findsLosing funds should force leaders to confront their own challenges, they said, while many voiced concerns over increasing foreign influence

About this contentSarah JohnsonThu 30 Jul 2026 01.00 EDTLast modified on Thu 30 Jul 2026 01.03 EDTSharePrefer the Guardian on GoogleA quarter of young Africans believe aid cuts by the US could have a positive impact, saying that losing foreign money will force leaders to confront and solve their own challenges, according to a new survey.

In Ghana and Nigeria, almost half (41% and 40% respectively) of young people aged 18 to 24 were optimistic, with Liberia not far behind (37%). A further one in 10 (11%) young people were uncertain about the impact, according to the African Youth Survey, which interviewed almost 5,000 people across 16 of the continent’s 54 recognised countries.

The Trump administration announced in early 2025 that it was eliminating more than 90% of USAID’s foreign contracts and $60bn in overall US assistance around the world. US foreign aid had been designed to play a critical role in tackling poverty, hunger and inequality worldwide.

Other countries, including Britain, France and Germany, have also been slashing aid budgets. The UK announced in February 2025 that the aid budget would be cut from 0.5% of gross national income to 0.3% in 2027, its lowest level as a percentage of national income since records began. The UN target is 0.7%.

Ivor Ichikowitz, whose South African family foundation commissioned the report, said: “The big picture [from the survey] is that the youth is concerned about governments that are overly influenced by foreign powers. What they’re saying is that African governments need to take agency and responsibility for their own reality.”

The sudden USAID cuts were met with public outrage and pushback from development and humanitarian organisations. They caused the closure of vital services, including maternity clinics, and medicine shortages at a time when UN agencies are struggling to find money for their humanitarian work and food insecurity has been worsened by the climate crisis.

According to the survey, nearly half of African youth (46%) did believe the closure of USAID would have a damaging impact on their countries, with healthcare services and disease prevention seen as the areas most affected. This anxiety is highest in Mozambique (76%), followed by Kenya (63%) and Rwanda (63%), where youth feel the cuts will disproportionately affect the most vulnerable members of society.

Degan Ali, executive director of Adeso, an African non-profit incubating ideas and enterprises to lower aid dependency, said that while the cuts were carried out in a “hugely irresponsible and inhumane” manner, she was not surprised that a significant proportion of young people saw positivity there. “I think it’s a reflection of the general feeling. A lot of people find aid very demeaning,” she said. “They didn’t feel that the aid was being used for the right things and there is a sense of ‘We can do this for ourselves’. The younger generation feel like our leaders are the duty bearers and are supposed to be handling the needs of our communities.”

Read moreShe said people believed that the aid that comes into a country is not going to the right causes or the right people. “There’s all this money going into the development sector, but they’re not really seeing major changes on the ground,” she said. “The younger generation is very politically active and more savvy. They are pushing back and trying to hold their leaders accountable.”

She also said that the youth was looking towards African role models on the continent, a move exemplified by the popularity of Burkina Faso’s military leader, Ibrahim Traoré, who portrays himself as a pan-Africanist figure leading his nation out of the clutches of western imperialism and neocolonialism.

“He is one of the more popular leaders across the entire continent of Africa,” said Ali. “There are matatus (minibus taxis) that have his name on in Nairobi, Kenya. The youth see that he is turning around a very poor country and that he really cares about his people. That further motivates young people to protest and say, ‘We don’t need aid, we have enough resources in our country and we need our leaders to behave differently.’”

Hibak Kalfan, executive director of Near, a network of civil society organisations from the global south, said the shuttering of USAID had led to the closure of initiatives and organisations across the whole continent, but had also created the opportunity to reconsider resources and sustainability. “It has put a real light on the fact that [organisations] have been highly dependent on bilateral external funding for years, and the future of aid will depend on a diversity of resources,” she said.